nOARcFfCuq 8 atbildes


	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:01:55) @twitter	I find it a bit uncomfortable that one of the major parts of a Ph.D. viva in the UK is verification of authorship. https://t.co/nOARcFfCuq
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:04:28) @twitter	@dimazest Supervisor’s (or second supervisor’s, or independent assessor’s) opinion might be enough in majority of the cases.
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:06:23) @twitter	@dimazest It might be a fix to the situation when a student meets with the supervisor once a year.
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:09:09) @twitter	@dimazest Why not to promote closer student-supervisor collaboration instead. Reserve more time and resources to it.
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:14:39) @twitter	Dedicate more time and resources to the supervision process.
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:15:28) @twitter	I didn’t decide to do a Ph.D. to cheat the system, I decided to do it because I believe it’s a right thing to do.
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:17:38) @twitter	That's what I've stated in my application documents. The truthfulness of my intentions should be validated during the interview process.
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:20:38) @twitter	The misalignment of my motivation (i want to do cool things) and university expectations (you might have cheated) is unfair.
	social.3dots.lv/@pixel (2016-03-25 17:23:47) @twitter	Hey, I quit an interesting (and well paid) job to do a Ph.D. Would I do it if I wanted to cheat?