Redzēju Klikā rakstu par Ivanu Iļjinu - no kā P. rāvis savus ideoloģijas pamatus. Tā kā neabonēju, palasījos pati: 3 atbildes

Ginta La
(2022-03-30 14:55:00)
@twitter
Redzēju Klikā rakstu par Ivanu Iļjinu - no kā P. rāvis savus ideoloģijas pamatus. Tā kā neabonēju, palasījos pati:
Ginta La
(2022-03-30 14:55:00)
@twitter
What Ilyin saw was a virginal Russian body. Like fascists and other authoritarians of his day, Ilyin insisted that his nation was a creature, "an organism of nature and the soul," an animal in Eden without original sin.
Ginta La
(2022-03-30 14:55:01)
@twitter
Who belonged within the Russian organism was not for the individual to decide, since cells do not decide whether they belong to a body. Russian culture, Ilyin wrote, automatically brought "fraternal union" wherever Russian power extended.
Ginta La
(2022-03-30 14:55:01)
@twitter
Ilyin wrote of "Ukrainians" in quotation marks, because he denied their separate existence beyond the Russian organism. To speak of Ukraine was to be a mortal enemy of Russia. /T. Snyder "The Road to Unfreedom"

© 2009-2017 civciv ;)