Here is the position paper in question. https://t.co/Gd4tiW4hNm I agree with the paper, except: (1) Position paper misleads the reader by saying that EV certificates are "disabled" in browsers. No, they are still widely accepted and there is no benefit to blocking them. https://t.co/AA1YAeIgfp 1 atbildes
 |
Kirils Solovjovs (2021-11-04 22:05:01) |
Here is the position paper in question. https://t.co/Gd4tiW4hNm I agree with the paper, except: (1) Position paper misleads the reader by saying that EV certificates are "disabled" in browsers. No, they are still widely accepted and there is no benefit to blocking them. https://t.co/AA1YAeIgfp | |
|
Kirils Solovjovs (2021-11-04 22:05:02) |
(2) Point 6 of the position paper has been largely mitigated by the sometimes hated Certificate Transparency which can be further extended to ensure safe operation. What about allowing TPS but not QWAC? | |