@martinsoz @piersmorgan Hint: it’s in the name 7 atbildes

N.R.
(04.04.2019 7:26:52)
@twitter
@martinsoz @piersmorgan Hint: it’s in the name
Martins Ozolins
(04.04.2019 7:37:17)
@twitter
@normis @piersmorgan Not really, there are 50shades of gray on interpreting this, and Leave promise was not a No De… https://t.co/Z09sGZvV8v
N.R.
(04.04.2019 7:38:30)
@twitter
@martinsoz @piersmorgan You can’t make referendums for complex questions as most people are idiots (simple math)
Martins Ozolins
(04.04.2019 8:28:05)
@twitter
@normis @piersmorgan Sure
N.R.
(04.04.2019 8:40:14)
@twitter
@martinsoz @piersmorgan Vai tad rezultāts to nepierāda?
Martins Ozolins
(04.04.2019 8:52:12)
@twitter
@normis Protams, tikai Tavs sakotnejais RT noradija uz to, ka cilvekiem vajadzeja uztvert Leave = No Deal, kas nav un nevar but taisniba
N.R.
(04.04.2019 9:02:40)
@twitter
@martinsoz Lielākā daļa balsotāju gribēja tieši to, vienkārši nesaprata kādas būs sekas. Gribēja atpakaļ zelta laik… https://t.co/n1W1DPuzUD
Martins Ozolins
(04.04.2019 12:40:03)
@twitter
@normis Domaju, ka vini gribeja Leave Promise, kas nebija reals formulejums (tb daba tads variants ka solija kampan… https://t.co/FRJ2qa8LDm